Journal of Critical Care
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-17, March 2007

Mechanical ventilation of patients hospitalized in medical wards vs the intensive care unit—an observational, comparative study

  • Moshe Hersch, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972 2 6555564; fax: +972 2 6555144.
    • Affiliated with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva).
  • ,
  • Moshe Sonnenblick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrics Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Affiliated with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva).
  • ,
  • Alexander Karlic, MD

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrics Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Affiliated with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva).
  • ,
  • Sharon Einav, MD

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Affiliated with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva).
  • ,
  • Charles L. Sprung, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • ,
  • Gabriel Izbicki, MD

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Institute of Pulmonology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • Affiliated with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva).

published online 03 February 2007.

Abstract 

Background

In some hospitals, patients are mechanically ventilated on the wards in addition to the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the shortage of ICU beds.

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome and ventilatory management of medical patients mechanically ventilated on the medical wards and in the ICU.

Design

This was a prospective, observational, noninterventional study over a 6-month period.

Setting

The study was conducted in internal medicine wards and the ICU of a 500-bed community university-affiliated hospital.

Patients

Ninety-nine mechanically ventilated medical patients in the ICU or on the medical wards because of shortage of ICU beds were included in the study.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients ventilated in the ICU (group 1) and in the medical wards (group 2) were collected. Thirty-four patients were ventilated in the ICU and 65 in the wards during the study period. In-hospital survival rate in group 1 was 38% vs 20% in group 2 (P < .05). The Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in group 1 was 24 ± 7 vs 27 ± 7 in group 2 (P < .05). Other prognostic factors were similar. The age of the survivors in the 2 groups was similar: 57 ± 25 years in group 1 vs 69 ± 13 years in group 2 (P = NS). Mean number of ventilatory changes in group 1 was 7.5 ± 1.4 per day per patient, whereas it was 1.3 ± 1.0 in group 2 (P < .001). The number of arterial blood gas analyses in group 1 was 7.7 ± 1.2 per day per patient compared with 2.3 ± 1.3 in group 2 (P < .001). Twenty percent (20%) of the patients in group 1 had endotracheal tube–related inadvertent events compared with 62% of the patients in group 2 (P < .05).

Conclusions

We conclude that in medical patients requiring mechanical ventilation, there is a higher in-hospital survival rate in ICU-ventilated patients as compared with ventilated patients managed on the medical wards. In addition, ICU provides a better monitoring associated with less endotracheal tube–related complications and more active ventilatory management.

Keywords: Mechanical ventilation, Intensive care units, Hospital departments, Treatment outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0883-9441(06)00085-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.004

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-17, March 2007