Journal of Critical Care
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 296-304, December 2007

Two perspectives on organ donation: experiences of potential donor families and intensive care physicians of the same event

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research Unit, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

published online 05 July 2007.

Abstract 

The aim was to explore how relatives and physicians understood cases where organ donation had been requested and what factors were salient for the decision on donation. Physicians of 25 deceased patients and 20 relatives were interviewed. The material was analyzed using qualitative methods. Eleven patients had declared their wishes on donation before death; in 14 cases the relatives had to decide. Half of these relatives accepted donation and half refused. The donation request was of secondary importance to the families; they were totally occupied by the death and initially tried to avoid the request by regarding “no” as a nonresponse. They needed support to relieve their immediate reactions of uneasiness, start rational thought processes, and reach well-grounded answers. The basis for requesting donation was good; relatives, with regard to circumstances, had been well prepared for the death by continuous information from the physicians and had confidence in staff, accepted that the question was raised, and understood the death criteria. However, about half the physicians experienced conflicts regarding prerequisites of procuring organs and dealing with relatives. Three different approaches were displayed: prodonation, neutral, and ambivalent. Only physicians with a prodonation approach received acceptance for donation.

Keywords:: Organ donation request, Transplantation, Death criteria, Intensive care, Attitudes, Conflict

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research (Stockholm).

PII: S0883-9441(07)00044-5

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.03.002

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 296-304, December 2007