Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 349-353, September 2008

Conscious sedation in the critically ill ventilated patient

  • Marco Cigada, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione - Università degli Studi di Milano, Polo Universitario San Paolo, 20142 Milano, Italy. Fax: +39 02 503 2 3137.
  • ,
  • Davide Corbella, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Giovanni Mistraletti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Chiara Reali Forster, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Concezione Tommasino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Alberto Morabito, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cattedra di Statistica Medica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Gaetano Iapichino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy

published online 05 July 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of sedation is to provide comfort and minimize anxiety. However, adverse effects are noteworthy, and the optimal end point of sedation in intensive care unit patients is still debated. We analyzed if a level 2 on the Ramsay Scale (ie, awake, cooperative, oriented, tranquil patient) is suitable for an invasive therapeutic approach.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two patients requiring respiratory support and sedation for at least 4 days were enrolled in a prospective interventional cohort study aiming at maintaining patients awake and collaborative. The Ramsay score was recorded 3 times a day. Once a day, the nurse in charge evaluated adequacy of sedation according to the compliance with nursing care and therapeutic maneuvers in the previous 24 hours. Data were collected until patients were ventilated.

Results

Overall, 264 of 582 days were classified as conscious. Sedation was adequate in 93.9% of them. In conscious days, a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score and male sex significantly correlated with inadequate sedation.

Conclusions

In a population of severe intensive care unit patients, conscious sedation was achieved in almost half of the days spent on ventilation. The positive implications (eg, on length of weaning and cost of sedation) of a conservative sedation strategy may be highly relevant.

Keywords: Sedation, Conscious sedation, Enteral sedation, Critically ill, Mechanical ventilation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0883-9441(07)00048-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.04.003

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 349-353, September 2008