Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 325-331, September 2008

Characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a medical emergency team review for respiratory distress or hypotension☆☆

Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia

published online 07 April 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a medical emergency team (MET) review for the MET syndromes of respiratory distress or hypotension and to assess the effect of delayed MET activation on their outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 2 cohorts of 100 patients for each of the MET syndromes of respiratory distress and hypotension. We collected information on patient demographics, comorbidities, presence of sepsis, and patient outcome. We documented the presence and duration of delayed MET activation.

Results

Patients with respiratory distress were more likely to be postoperative (40% vs 28%, P = .07), but less likely to have a history of congestive cardiac failure (12% vs 22%, P = .06). Sepsis was present in 58% of cases. The hospital mortality for MET calls due to respiratory distress and hypotension was 38% and 35%, respectively (P = .77). Delayed MET calls occurred in 50% of patients with the MET syndrome of respiratory distress and in 39% of those with hypotension (P = .11). The median duration of delay was 12 hours in patients with respiratory distress compared to 5 hours for patients with hypotension (P = .016). A delay in making a MET call was associated with an increase in mortality (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.34; P = .045).

Conclusions

Patients receiving MET calls for respiratory distress or hypotension were elderly and had a mortality greater than 35%. In many cases, MET activation was delayed. This delay was associated with increased mortality.

Keywords: Medical emergency team, Respiratory distress, Hypotension, Delay, Outcome, Mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Austin Hospital Intensive Care Trust Fund (Victoria, Australia).

☆☆ The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in relation to this study.

PII: S0883-9441(07)00186-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.11.002

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 325-331, September 2008