Modeling in-hospital patient survival during the first 28 days after intensive care unit admission:☆
A prognostic model for clinical trials in general critically ill patients
Abstract
Objective
The objective of the study was to develop a model for estimating patient 28-day in-hospital mortality using 2 different statistical approaches.
Design
The study was designed to develop an outcome prediction model for 28-day in-hospital mortality using (a) logistic regression with random effects and (b) a multilevel Cox proportional hazards model.
Setting
The study involved 305 intensive care units (ICUs) from the basic Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 cohort.
Patients and Participants
Patients (n = 17
138) were from the SAPS 3 database with follow-up data pertaining to the first 28 days in hospital after ICU admission.
Interventions
None.
Measurements and Results
The database was divided randomly into 5 roughly equal-sized parts (at the ICU level). It was thus possible to run the model-building procedure 5 times, each time taking four fifths of the sample as a development set and the remaining fifth as the validation set. At 28 days after ICU admission, 19.98% of the patients were still in the hospital. Because of the different sampling space and outcome variables, both models presented a better fit in this sample than did the SAPS 3 admission score calibrated to vital status at hospital discharge, both on the general population and in major subgroups.
Conclusions
Both statistical methods can be used to model the 28-day in-hospital mortality better than the SAPS 3 admission model. However, because the logistic regression approach is specifically designed to forecast 28-day mortality, and given the high uncertainty associated with the assumption of the proportionality of risks in the Cox model, the logistic regression approach proved to be superior.
Keywords: Intensive care, Critical care, Severity scores, Outcome, 28-day survival
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Authors' contribution and competing interests. Rui Moreno and Philipp Metnitz actively organized and chaired the SAPS 3 project (see electronic supplementary material for a complete list of participants in the project) and actively participated in all steps of data collection, analysis, and model development. Barbara Metnitz and Peter Bauer were responsible for data management and statistical analysis of the SAPS 3 project. Manuscript preparation was done by Rui Moreno, Philipp Metnitz, and Barbara Metnitz.
PII: S0883-9441(07)00188-8
doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.11.004
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
