Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 339-348, September 2008

Modeling in-hospital patient survival during the first 28 days after intensive care unit admission:

A prognostic model for clinical trials in general critically ill patients

  • Rui P. Moreno, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de St. António dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, E. P. E., Lisboa, Portugal
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Fax: +351 21 3153784.
  • ,
  • Philipp G.H. Metnitz, MD, PhD, DEAA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Barbara Metnitz, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical University of Vienna, Core Unit for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Section of Medical Statistics, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Peter Bauer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical University of Vienna, Core Unit for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Section of Medical Statistics, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Susana Afonso de Carvalho, MD

      Affiliations

    • Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de St. António dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, E. P. E., Lisboa, Portugal
  • ,
  • Anette Hoechtl, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • on behalf of the SAPS 3 Investigators

published online 06 May 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of the study was to develop a model for estimating patient 28-day in-hospital mortality using 2 different statistical approaches.

Design

The study was designed to develop an outcome prediction model for 28-day in-hospital mortality using (a) logistic regression with random effects and (b) a multilevel Cox proportional hazards model.

Setting

The study involved 305 intensive care units (ICUs) from the basic Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 cohort.

Patients and Participants

Patients (n = 17138) were from the SAPS 3 database with follow-up data pertaining to the first 28 days in hospital after ICU admission.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Results

The database was divided randomly into 5 roughly equal-sized parts (at the ICU level). It was thus possible to run the model-building procedure 5 times, each time taking four fifths of the sample as a development set and the remaining fifth as the validation set. At 28 days after ICU admission, 19.98% of the patients were still in the hospital. Because of the different sampling space and outcome variables, both models presented a better fit in this sample than did the SAPS 3 admission score calibrated to vital status at hospital discharge, both on the general population and in major subgroups.

Conclusions

Both statistical methods can be used to model the 28-day in-hospital mortality better than the SAPS 3 admission model. However, because the logistic regression approach is specifically designed to forecast 28-day mortality, and given the high uncertainty associated with the assumption of the proportionality of risks in the Cox model, the logistic regression approach proved to be superior.

Keywords: Intensive care, Critical care, Severity scores, Outcome, 28-day survival

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Authors' contribution and competing interests. Rui Moreno and Philipp Metnitz actively organized and chaired the SAPS 3 project (see electronic supplementary material for a complete list of participants in the project) and actively participated in all steps of data collection, analysis, and model development. Barbara Metnitz and Peter Bauer were responsible for data management and statistical analysis of the SAPS 3 project. Manuscript preparation was done by Rui Moreno, Philipp Metnitz, and Barbara Metnitz.

PII: S0883-9441(07)00188-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.11.004

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 339-348, September 2008