Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 484-492, December 2008

Patient-specific decision modeling to guide the use of drotrecogin α (activated) in patients with severe sepsis

  • Daniel P. Schauer, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
    • Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. University of Cincinnati Medical Center, PO Box 670535, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA. Tel.: +1 513 558 2048; fax: +1 513 558 2744.
  • ,
  • Anthony C. Leonard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
    • Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
  • ,
  • Richard W. Hornung, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45224-3039, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph A. Johnston, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
    • U.S. Outcomes Research, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
  • ,
  • Mark H. Eckman, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA
    • Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535, USA

published online 07 April 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

The expected benefit of treating severe sepsis with drotrecogin α (activated) for an individual patient may depend upon several clinical factors including disease severity. Our objective was to create a decision support tool incorporating patient-specific inputs to estimate the balance between treatment risks and benefits for individual patients with severe sepsis.

Materials and Methods

Logistic regression models were developed to calculate patient-specific mortality risk with and without treatment, which were then used as inputs into a 75-state Markov model. Patient-specific inputs included patient age, sex, and 12 readily available clinical characteristics.

Results

The expected benefit from drotrecogin α (activated) treatment was most dependent upon the underlying disease severity. For example, for a 56-year-old white man with severe sepsis and a 28-day mortality risk of 29%, the model predicted a treatment-related gain of 1.2 quality-adjusted life years (17.3 vs 16.1). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that this patient would benefit from therapy 85% of the time.

Conclusions

A customizable decision model using patient-specific inputs can be used to inform the treatment decision when considering the use of drotrecogin α (activated) therapy by weighing the risks vs the benefits of therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis.

Keywords: Patient-specific decision modeling, Drotrecogin α, Sepsis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial support for this study was provided entirely by an unrestricted educational grant from the Eli Lilly Company. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The following author is employed by the sponsor: Joseph A. Johnston, MD, MSc.

PII: S0883-9441(08)00022-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.016

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 484-492, December 2008