Journal of Critical Care
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 494-500, December 2009

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy–assisted percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in obese critically ill patients: A prospective and comparative study

  • Carlos M. Romero

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Unidad de Pacientes Críticos, Departamento de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Chile, Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Santiago Norte, Chile. Fax: +56 2 9788264.
  • ,
  • Rodrigo A. Cornejo

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital
  • ,
  • Mauricio H. Ruiz

      Affiliations

    • Respiratory Disease Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chile Clinical Hospital, 8380430
  • ,
  • L. Ricardo Gálvez

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital
  • ,
  • Osvaldo P. Llanos

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital
  • ,
  • Eduardo A. Tobar

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital
  • ,
  • Jorge F. Larrondo

      Affiliations

    • Medical Student, University of Chile Faculty of Medicine
  • ,
  • José S. Castro

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care Unit, University of Chile Clinical Hospital

published online 16 September 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Obesity has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. In Latin America, 10% to 35% of the population is obese. Obese critically ill patients are at greater risk for requiring intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation; and in some cases, it is necessary to perform a tracheostomy.

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare the incidence of perioperative complications associated with percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) using the fiberoptic bronchoscopy–assisted Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN) in obese vs nonobese critically ill patients.

Patients and Method

A prospective evaluation was made of 120 patients who underwent PT because of prolonged mechanical ventilation. An analysis of the incidence of operative and early postoperative complications was performed comparing an obese patient group (n = 25) with a nonobese patient group (n = 80). Obesity was defined by a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2.

Results

The 2 groups had no significant differences in their demographic characteristics. The average body mass index for the obese patient group was 38 ± 9 kg/m2 vs 22 ± 3 kg/m2 for the nonobese patient group (P < .001). The obese patients required 18 ± 7 days of mechanical ventilation, on average, before PT vs 16 ± 7 days for the nonobese patients (P = .15). The incidence of operative complications for the obese patients vs nonobese patients was 8% and 7.5%, respectively (P = 1). The incidence of early postoperative complications was 8% for the obese patients vs 2.5% for the nonobese patients (P = .2).

Conclusion

Percutaneous tracheostomy using the fiberoptic bronchoscopy–assisted Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique is safe for obese critically ill patients when performed by an experienced intensivist.

Keywords: Tracheostomy, Percutaneous tracheostomy, Obesity, Prolonged mechanical ventilation, Fiberoptic bronchoscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors declare that they have no competing interest. This study was not supported by a medical company.

PII: S0883-9441(08)00137-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.06.001

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 494-500, December 2009