Journal of Critical Care
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 347-361, September 2009

Predicting clinical physiology: A Markov chain model of heart rate recovery after spontaneous breathing trials in mechanically ventilated patients

  • Yan Lu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
    • These authors contributed equally to the work.
  • ,
  • Anton Burykin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
    • These authors contributed equally to the work.
  • ,
  • Michael W. Deem, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
  • ,
  • Timothy G. Buchman, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Abstract 

Analysis of heart rate (HR) dynamics before, during, and after a physiologic stress has clinical importance. For example, the celerity of heart rate recovery (HRR) after a cardiac stress test (eg, treadmill exercise test) has been shown to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Heart rate dynamics are modulated, in part, by the autonomic nervous system. These dynamics are commonly abstracted using metrics of heart rate variability (HRV), which are known to be sensitive to the influence of the autonomic nervous system on HR. The patient-specific modulators of HR should be reflected both in the response to stress as well as in the recovery from stress. We therefore hypothesized that the patient-specific HR response to stress could be used to predict the HRR after the stress.

We devised a Markov chain model to predict the poststress HRR dynamics using the parameters (transition matrix) calculated from HR data during the stress. The model correctly predicts the exponential shape of poststress HRR. This model features a simple analytical relationship linking poststress HRR time constant (Toff) with a standard measure of HRV, namely the correlation coefficient of the Poincaré plot (first return map) of the HR recorded during the stress. A corresponding relationship exists between the time constant (Ton) of R-R interval decrease at the onset of stress and the correlation coefficient of the Poincaré plot of prestress R-R intervals. Consequently, the model can be used for the prediction of poststress HRR using the HRV measured during the stress. This direct relationship between the event-to-event microscopic fluctuations (HRV) during the stress and the macroscopic response (HRR) after the stress terminates can be interpreted as an instance of a fluctuation-dissipation relationship. We have thus applied the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to the analysis of heart rate dynamics.

The approach is specific neither to cardiac physiology nor to transitions between mechanical and free ventilation as a specific stress. It may therefore have wider applicability to physiologic systems subject to modest stresses.

Keywords: Heart rate variability, Heart rate recovery, Mechanical ventilation, Spontaneous breathing trial, Physiologic stress, Markov chain, Fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Poincaré plot

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was generously supported by grants from the James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020070), DARPA (49533-LS-DRP and HR0011-05-1-0057), and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation.

PII: S0883-9441(09)00067-7

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.01.014

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 347-361, September 2009