Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 69-77, March 2010

Pharmacodynamic-based clinical pathway for empiric antibiotic choice in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

  • Anthony M. Nicasio, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Antiinfective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA
  • ,
  • Kathryn J. Eagye, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Antiinfective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA
  • ,
  • David P. Nicolau, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA

      Affiliations

    • Center for Antiinfective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA
    • Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
  • ,
  • Eric Shore, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
    • University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
  • ,
  • Marc Palter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurosurgery/Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
  • ,
  • Judith Pepe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Surgery/Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
    • University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Antiinfective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 860 545 3612; fax: +1 860 545 3992.

published online 08 May 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Because of the high frequency of multidrug resistant bacteria in our intensive care units (ICUs), we implemented a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) clinical pathway based on unit-specific minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and pharmacodynamic modeling in 3 of our ICUs.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational evaluation with a historical control group in adult patients (n = 168) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for VAP. Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine antibiotic regimens having the greatest likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic regimens were incorporated into an ICU-specific computerized clinical pathway as empiric agents of choice.

Results

Pharmacodynamic modeling found 3-hour infusions of cefepime 2 g every 8 hours or meropenem 2 g every 8 hours plus tobramycin and vancomycin would provide the greatest probability of empirically treating VAP in these ICUs. Infection-related mortality was reduced by 69% (8.5% vs 21.6%; P = .029), infection-related length of stay was shorter (11.7 ± 8.1 vs 26.1 ± 18.5; P < .001), and fewer superinfections were observed in patients treated on the pathway. A number of patients with nonsusceptible P aeruginosa were successfully treated with high-dose, 3-hour infusion regimens.

Conclusions

In our ICUs where multidrug resistant bacteria are common, an approach considering ICU-specific antibiotic MICs coupled with pharmacodynamic dosing strategies resulted in improved outcomes and shorter duration of treatments.

Keywords: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Antibiotics, Pharmacodynamics, ICU, Resistance, Mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was partially funded by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Del. E-test strips were graciously donated by AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden. Drs Nicolau and Kuti are members of the speakers bureau, hired as consultants, and received research funding from AstraZeneca LP. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

PII: S0883-9441(09)00072-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.02.014

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 69-77, March 2010