Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 359.e9-359.e12, June 2010

Managing intensive care units: Make LOVE, not war!

  • Jean Carlet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Réanimation Polyvalente, 75014 Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), 93218 Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex, France.
  • ,
  • Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Réanimation Polyvalente, 75014 Paris, France
    • Inserm U 823 Grenoble, France
  • ,
  • Marie-Françoise Dumay, HN

      Affiliations

    • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Réanimation Polyvalente, 75014 Paris, France
  • ,
  • Fredérique Diaw, HN

      Affiliations

    • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Réanimation Polyvalente, 75014 Paris, France
  • ,
  • Bertrand Guidet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Réanimation Médicale, 75012, and INSERM U 707, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Jean-François Timsit, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CHU Hôpital Albert Michallon, Réanimation Médicale, BP 217 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
    • Inserm U 823 Grenoble, France
  • ,
  • Benoit Misset, MD

      Affiliations

    • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Réanimation Polyvalente, 75014 Paris, France
    • Université Paris Descartes

published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

Describe a program set up in a French intensive care unit (ICU) aimed at improving communication inside the team and communication information given to patients and their relatives; explain how those actions can improve communication inside the ICU and ultimately why it could improve patient's outcome.

Design and Methods

Position paper.

Intervention

Progressive implementation of multifaceted quality improvement program.

Results

The program Leadership, Ownership, Values, and Evaluation (LOVE) was developed over 10 years. It was usually well accepted by the members of the team, patients, and relatives, in particular the 24-hour visiting program that was prospectively evaluated. Information and decisions were shared with the patients or more often with the relatives, who became for some of them really “part of the team.” Additional actions such as participation to some of the simplest cares by the families are under investigation. A prospective evaluation of such programs, although difficult to perform, remains probably necessary.

Conclusion

Quality of life within the ICU is based on many factors including a strong and positive leadership, an absolute respect of individuals, and a rigorous evaluation of quality of care, which could influence heavily the quality of life in the ICU for patients, relatives, and health care professionals and facilitate team work. Whether this could really influence outcome remains to be demonstrated.

Keywords: Leadership, Organization, Culture, Clinical governance, Love, Evaluation, Intensive care unit

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0883-9441(10)00009-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.009

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 359.e9-359.e12, June 2010