Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 359.e1-359.e7, June 2010

Triggers for emergency team activation: A multicenter assessment☆☆

  • Jack Chen, MBBS, PhD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, Liverpool Health Service, Liverpool BC, Sydney NSW 1871, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9612 0635; fax: +61 2 9612 0742.
  • ,
  • Rinaldo Bellomo, FRACP, FJFICM, MD

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Austin Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Ken Hillman, MBBS, FRCA, FACA, FJFICM, MD

      Affiliations

    • Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • ,
  • Arthas Flabouris, MBBS, FJFICM, FANZCA, PostGrad Dip Aviation Med

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • ,
  • Simon Finfer, MBBS, FRCA, FRCP, FJFICM

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • ,
  • the MERIT Study Investigators for the Simpson Centre and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group

published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to examine triggers for emergency team activation in hospitals with or without a medical emergency team (MET) system.

Materials and Methods

Within a cluster randomized controlled trial examining the effect of introducing a MET system, we recorded the triggers for emergency team activation. We compared the proportion and rate of such triggers in hospitals with or without a MET system and in relation to type of hospital, type of patient ward, and time of day.

Results

In control hospitals, the most common trigger for emergency team activation was a decrease in Glasgow Coma Score by 2 or more points (45.6%), whereas in MET hospitals, it was the fact that staff members were “worried” or the call occurred despite the lack of a “specified reason” (39.3%). In particular, MET hospitals were 35 times more likely to make a call because of staff being “worried” about the patient (14.1% vs 0.4%, P < .001). Control hospitals were also significantly more likely to call an emergency team because of a deteriorating respiratory (P = .003) or pulse (P < .001) rate, more calls had at least 3 triggers for activation (20.8% vs 10.2%, P = .036), and the average number of triggers per call was significantly higher (P = .013). Nonmetropolitan hospitals were more likely to call an emergency team because of respiratory rate abnormalities (33.6% vs 23.2%, P = .015). Coronary care unit calls were more likely to be triggered by abnormalities in pulse rate and systolic blood pressure, and more calls occurred during the period from 6:00 am to noon.

Conclusions

In MET hospitals, more emergency team calls are triggered because staff members are worried about the patient; and fewer calls have multiple triggers. Type of hospital, type of ward, and time of day also affect the nature and frequency of triggers for emergency team activation.

Keywords: Medical emergency team, Rapid response system, Rapid response team, Critical care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The MERIT study is a collaboration of the Simpson Centre for Health Services Research and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group.

☆☆ Sources of support for the study: The study was funded by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Foundation as part of the MERIT study.

PII: S0883-9441(10)00011-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.011

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 359.e1-359.e7, June 2010