Journal of Critical Care
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 76-81, February 2011

Reduced mortality after the implementation of a protocol for the early detection of severe sepsis

  • Glauco A. Westphal, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
    • Centro Hospitalar Unimed, Joinville, Brazil 89204-060
  • ,
  • Álvaro Koenig, MD

      Affiliations

    • Centro Hospitalar Unimed, Joinville, Brazil 89204-060
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Rua Plácido Gomes, 500-Bairro Anita Garibaldi, Joinville, SC 89202-050, Brazil.
  • ,
  • Milton Caldeira Filho, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
  • ,
  • Janaína Feijó, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
  • ,
  • Louise Trindade de Oliveira

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
  • ,
  • Fernanda Nunes

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
  • ,
  • Kênia Fujiwara, MD

      Affiliations

    • Centro Hospitalar Unimed, Joinville, Brazil 89204-060
  • ,
  • Sheila Fonseca Martins

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000
  • ,
  • Anderson R. Roman Gonçalves, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Brazil 89202-000

published online 01 November 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

We evaluate the impact that implementing an in-hospital protocol for the early detection of sepsis risk has on mortality from severe sepsis/septic shock.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study conducted in 2 phases at 2 general hospitals in Brazil. In phase I, patients with severe sepsis/septic shock were identified and treated in accordance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Over the subsequent 12 months (phase II), patients with severe sepsis/septic shock were identified by means of active surveillance for signs of sepsis risk (SSR). We compared the 2 cohorts in terms of demographic variables, the time required for the identification of at least 2 SSRs, compliance with sepsis bundles (6- and 24-hour), and mortality rates.

Results

We identified 217 patients with severe sepsis/septic shock (102 during phase I and 115 during phase II). There were significant differences between phases I and II in terms of the time required for the identification of at least 2 SSRs (34 ± 48 vs 11 ± 17 hours; P < .001) and in terms of in-hospital mortality (61.7% vs 38.2%; P < .001).

Conclusion

The early detection of sepsis promoted early treatment, reducing in-hospital mortality from severe sepsis/septic shock.

Keywords: Septic shock, Severe sepsis, Outcomes, Diagnosis, Hospital mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0883-9441(10)00217-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.001

Journal of Critical Care
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 76-81, February 2011