Elsevier

Journal of Critical Care

Volume 38, April 2017, Pages 245-252
Journal of Critical Care

Clinical Potpourri
Paracetamol in fever in critically ill patients—an update,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Fever, which is arbitrary defined as an increase in body temperature above 38.3°C, can affect up to 90% of patients admitted in intensive care unit. Induction of fever is mediated by the release of pyrogenic cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 1, interleukin 6, and interferons). Fever is associated with increased length of stay in intensive care unit and with a worse outcome in some subgroups of patients (mainly neurocritically ill patients). Although fever can increase oxygen consumption in unstable patients, on the contrary, it can activate physiologic systems that are involved in pathogens clearance. Treatments to reduce fever include the use of antipyretics. Thus, the reduction of fever might reduce the ability to develop an efficient host response. This balance, between harms and benefits, has to be taken into account every time we decide to treat or not to treat fever in a given patient. Among the antipyretics, paracetamol is one of the most common used. Paracetamol is a synthetic, nonopioid, centrally acting analgesic, and antipyretic drug. Its antipyretic effect occurs because it inhibits cyclooxygenase-3 and the prostaglandin synthesis, within the central nervous system, resetting the hypothalamic heat-regulation center. In this clinical review, we will summarize the use of paracetamol as antipyretic in critically ill patients (sepsis, trauma, neurological, and medical).

Introduction

Fever, defined as an increase in body temperature above 38.3°C, is a common finding in the critically ill patients, ranging between 30% up to 90% of the patients and may result from infectious and noninfectious (only inflammatory) causes [1]. In healthy subjects, thermoregulation maintains core body temperature within a narrow normal range, despite changes in environmental conditions. The center of thermoregulation has been identified in the preoptic area of hypothalamus; hypothalamic neurons elaborate 2 types of signals. The first one from peripheral neurons that are connected to thermoreceptors and the second from thermoreceptors located directly in the hypothalamus. A normal temperature is achieved by balancing heat production from muscles, hepatic metabolism, and heat loss to the environment [2]. Induction of fever is mediated by the release of pyrogenic cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 1, interleukin 6, and interferons) [3]. These cytokines are involved in immunologic activation and reaction against pathogens. According to the new Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock, sepsis is characterized by an aberrant and dysregulated host response, in addition to the presence of organ dysfunctions [4]. Fever is associated with increased length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and with a worse outcome in some subgroups of patients (mainly with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and pancreatitis) [5], [6], [7], [8]. On the one hand, fever increases oxygen consumption in unstable patients, and on the other hand activates physiologic systems that are involved in pathogens clearance. Treatments to reduce body temperature may be utilized to reduce metabolic rate and hence, oxygen demand [9] or to reduce further brain cell death after brain injury or hemorrhage [10]. Furthermore, reduction of fever could reduce the ability of one patient to develop an efficient host response. This balance, between harms and benefits, has to be taken into account every time we decide to treat or not to treat fever in a given patient. The last Consensus Surviving Sepsis Campaign did not make any recommendations regarding the use of antipyretics. However, several drugs have been suggested for fever control; among them, paracetamol is one of the most common used one [11], [12], [13]. Paracetamol is a synthetic, nonopioid, centrally acting analgesic, and antipyretic drug. Paracetamol can be administered enterally or intravenously; also its precursor, the propacetamol, could be administered by the same routes. When administered, the propacetamol is quickly hydrolyzed to paracetamol and diethylglycine. Its antipyretic effect occurs because it inhibits cyclooxygenase-3 and the prostaglandin synthesis, within the central nervous system, resetting the hypothalamic heat-regulation center [3]. As for all the other drugs, hypersensitivity to paracetamol or to other molecules contained into the pharmacologic formulation is possible. The most serious acute adverse effect of overdosage of paracetamol is a potentially fatal hepatic necrosis. The mechanism involves paracetamol conversion to a toxic metabolite (NAPQI). It is eliminated by conjugation with glutathione and then further metabolized and excreted into the urine. In the setting of paracetamol overdose, hepatocellular levels of glutathione become depleted and NAPQI metabolite binds to cell macromolecules, leading to dysfunction of enzymatic systems and structural and metabolic derangement. For this reason, patients with liver impairment are always excluded from trial in which paracetamol is administered. In this clinical review, we will summarize the use of paracetamol as antipyretic in critically ill patients (sepsis, trauma, neurological, and medical).

Section snippets

Literature findings

Evidence synthesis and possible flowchart for fever treatment is reported in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Fig. 1. All clinically relevant articles identified searching for “fever” AND “ICU” AND “acetaminophen” OR “paracetamol” in PubMed in May 2016 are included in our review. We included randomized trials and observational (prospective and retrospective) studies. Data about schedule of paracetamol administration are often missed in the observational studies, whereas in the randomized trials

Conclusions

Based on the available literature and as summarized in Fig. 1, the control of fever in critically ill patients should be always considered in the early phase and adapted according to the underlying etiology: in brain injury, fever should always be treated while in trauma and in severe sepsis depending on the number of organ dysfunction. Paracetamol, although relatively safe, does not present beneficial effects on the short outcome. No evidence is available in literature about preferring one

References (43)

  • M. Singer et al.

    The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • A. Geffroy et al.

    Severe traumatic head injury in adults: which patients are at risk of early hyperthermia?

    Intensive Care Med

    (2004)
  • J. Oliveira-Filho et al.

    Fever in subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship to vasospasm and outcome

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • K.B. Laupland et al.

    Occurrence and outcome of fever in critically ill adults

    Crit Care Med

    (2008)
  • L.A. Greisman et al.

    Fever: beneficial and detrimental effects of antipyretics

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • J.S. Hata et al.

    A prospective, observational clinical trial of fever reduction to reduce systemic oxygen consumption in the setting of acute brain injury

    Neurocrit Care

    (2008)
  • G. Luheshi et al.

    Cytokines and fever

    Int Arch Allergy Immunol

    (1996)
  • H. Honarmand et al.

    Randomized trial of the effect of intravenous paracetamol on inflammatory biomarkers and outcome in febrile critically ill adults

    Daru

    (2012)
  • I. Mackenzie et al.

    Effects of acetaminophen administration to patients in intensive care

    Intensive Care Med

    (2000)
  • M. Hersch et al.

    Effect of intravenous propacetamol on blood pressure in febrile critically ill patients

    Pharmacotherapy

    (2008)
  • V. Gozzoli et al.

    Randomized trial of the effect of antipyresis by metamizol, propacetamol or external cooling on metabolism, hemodynamics and inflammatory response

    Intensive Care Med

    (2004)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Supralingual administration of paracetamol embedded in polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers: A pharmacokinetic study

      2022, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since it does not cause gastrointestinal side effects, paracetamol is commonly the first choice for pain management compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [2]. Pronounced antipyretic effect and relatively safe use in pregnancy and childhood, even in neonates, are the other reasons for its widespread use [3–5]. In clinical practise, paracetamol is used both orally and intravenously [6].

    • Host-guest paracetamol/cyclodextrin complex formation evaluated from coupled diffusion measurements

      2021, Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics
      Citation Excerpt :

      HPA is an important analgesic drug and antipyretic agent. It can be used in the management of more severe pain and provide palliative care in advanced cancer patients [22,23] and is recommended as the first-line treatment to reduce fever caused by cold, flu, and coronavirus [24]. Despite the relatively high solubility of HPA in aqueous solution (17.39 g/kg of water, at 303 K [25]), HPA can form a 1:1 inclusion complex with β-cyclodextrin

    • Coupled mutual diffusion in aqueous paracetamol + sodium hydroxide solutions

      2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Paracetamol (PAR, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) acetamide) belongs to the class of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs due to its remarkable analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic action [1,2].

    • Effect of selective brain cooling versus core cooling on achieving target temperature among patients with severe traumatic brain injury

      2020, International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, the clinical utility of TTM has yet to be conclusively demonstrated in terms of reduced mortality or improved functional survival in the clinical setting of severe TBI. It is clear, though, that some controversy still exists and randomized trials are lacking (Maekawa, Yamashita, Nagao, Hayashi, & Ohashi, 2015; Suehiro et al., 2015; Chiumello, Gotti, & Vergani, 2016) conducted studies to determine the safety and efficacy of the routine administration of intravenous antipyretics in reducing body temperature following severe TBI. It was found that antipyretics did not significantly reduce core body temperature.

    • 1,4-Dihydroquinazolin-3(2H)-yl benzamide derivatives as anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents with an improved gastric profile: Design, synthesis, COX-1/2 inhibitory activity and molecular docking study

      2019, Bioorganic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used for decades worldwide for symptomatic treatment of acute and chronic pain, and these drugs are known for their effects on fever, inflammation and rheumatic disorders [1–3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: None

    ☆☆

    Clinical Review

    View full text