Elsevier

Journal of Critical Care

Volume 40, August 2017, Pages 296-302
Journal of Critical Care

Sepsis / Infection
Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives,☆☆,☆☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • EHR-based, sepsis-recognition tool provided hourly, hospital-wide sepsis screening.

  • Adjusted MEWS-SRS score was tailored to screen for sepsis at our institution.

  • Nurse-led Rapid Response Team was instrumental in sepsis care delivery on the wards.

  • Hospital-wide sepsis alert order set was based on a simplified 3 h bundle.

  • Associated reductions in mortality, length of stay, and mechanical ventilation use.

Abstract

Purpose

Sepsis can lead to poor outcomes when treatment is delayed or inadequate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after initiation of a hospital-wide sepsis alert program.

Materials and methods

Retrospective review of patients ≥ 18 years treated for sepsis.

Results

There were 3917 sepsis admissions: 1929 admissions before, and 1988 in the after phase. Mean age (57.3 vs. 57.1, p = 0.94) and Charlson Comorbidity Scores (2.52 vs. 2.47, p = 0.35) were similar between groups. Multivariable analyses identified significant reductions in the after phase for odds of death (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.99, p = 0.046), mean intensive care unit LOS (2.12 days before, 95%CI 1.97, 2.34; 1.95 days after, 95%CI 1.75, 2.06; p < 0.001), mean overall hospital LOS (11.7 days before, 95% CI 10.9, 12.7 days; 9.9 days after, 95% CI 9.3, 10.6 days, p < 0.001), odds of mechanical ventilation use (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39, 0.99, p = 0.007), and total charges with a savings of $7159 per sepsis admission (p = 0.036). There was no reduction in vasopressor use (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75, 0.1.06, p = 0.18).

Conclusion

A hospital-wide program utilizing electronic recognition and RRT intervention resulted in improved outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Introduction

Sepsis is a life-threatening, dysregulated host response to infection that leads to organ dysfunction [1] and is the primary cause of death from infection [2]. Over 750,000 cases of sepsis occur annually in the United States, with the number and rate of hospitalizations tripling over the last two decades and continuing to climb each year [2], [3], [4]. Sepsis was also the most expensive condition billed to Medicare in 2011, costing over $20 billion that year [5]. Care for sepsis patients frequently involves prolonged length of stay (LOS) incurring higher overall healthcare costs [6]. According to the Centers for Disease Control, patients hospitalized for sepsis had an average LOS that was 75% longer than patients hospitalized for other conditions [2]. Given that the rate of hospitalization for sepsis is much higher for those aged 65 and over, the incidence is expected to continue to grow with the aging U.S. population [3], [6], [7].

Sepsis mortality decreases with early recognition and treatment [1], [8]. Therefore, sepsis screening and early, aggressive care is vital to increasing the chance of survival. Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, an international effort promoting widespread early recognition and implementation of treatment bundles, have been associated with mortality reduction in sepsis [8], [9]. At our institution, we implemented a multidisciplinary, hospital-wide program which included an electronic health record (EHR) sepsis recognition tool, education, standardized management bundles, and designated team responders for each area of the hospital including the rapid response team (RRT) for inpatients. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the sepsis alert program on the primary outcome of inpatient mortality and secondary outcomes including intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, hospital LOS, mechanical ventilation use, vasopressor use, and hospital charges per sepsis admission.

Section snippets

Study design

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated at UF Health Jacksonville for sepsis from October 1, 2013 to November 10, 2015 to evaluate sepsis outcomes before and after implementation of the program. UF Health Jacksonville is a not-for-profit, academic medical center and is a 696-bed level 1 trauma center with 142 intensive care beds and is a regional referral center. The sepsis alert program was initiated on November 19, 2014, and groups were dichotomized as “before” and “after”

Details of overall cohort

There were 3205 unique patients with 3917 sepsis admissions over the study period: 1637 unique patients with 1929 admissions in the before phase, and 1568 unique patients with 1988 admissions in the after phase. Of these, there were 2585 (81%) unique patients with sepsis present on admission (POA), and 620 unique patients with non-POA (19%) sepsis, or sepsis acquired during admission. There were 3186 sepsis POA admissions (1558 before, 1628 after), and 731 non-POA sepsis admissions (371 before,

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we have demonstrated that a comprehensive, program for sepsis recognition and management is associated with improved outcomes. Our findings demonstrate that a hospital-wide initiative as well as a team approach to sepsis care was associated with reductions in inpatient sepsis mortality, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, mechanical ventilation use, and hospital charges.

Our program involved a multifaceted approach to the complex problem of sepsis. The main goal of the program

Conclusion

In conclusion, the implementation of a comprehensive, hospital-wide program for sepsis recognition and management may significantly improve inpatient sepsis mortality, ICU LOS, overall hospital LOS, mechanical ventilation use, and hospital charges.

Abbreviations

    LOS

    length of stay

    SSC

    Surviving Sepsis Campaign

    EHR

    electronic health record

    RRT

    rapid response team

    ED

    emergency department

    ICU

    intensive care unit

    SBP

    systolic blood pressure

    MEWS-SRS

    Modified Early Warning Signs–Sepsis Recognition Score

    SIRS

    systemic inflammatory response syndrome

    POA

    present on admission

    Non-POA

    non-present on admission

    SD

    standard deviation

    OR

    odds ratio

    CI

    confidence interval

    SOFA

    sequential organ failure assessment

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the UF Health Jacksonville Institutional Review Board.

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Funding

This study was supported by a W. Martin Smith Grant from the University of Florida awarded to Dr.Lisa Jones as principle investigator and Dr. Faheem Guirgis as co-investigator.

Author contributions

FWG, LJ, RE, AW, JF, CG, KW, JR and KGE devised the study. FWG, LJ, RE AW, CC, KM, LM, CS, DFK, CG and KGE supervised the data collection and chart reviews. CS, DFK, FAM provided methodological and statistical advice on study design and data analysis. FWG, LJ, JF, JR, and FAM provided expertise on sepsis. RE and KW provided IT expertise. AW and KGE provided expertise in quality improvement. FWG, RE, KM, JF, CC, LM, CS, DFK, and KGE drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Colleen Kalynych MSH, EdD, Jennifer Reynolds MPH, Nisha Patel BS, and Robert Cowan for their contributions to this project.

References (25)

  • F.W. Guirgis et al.

    Proactive rounding by the rapid response team reduces inpatient cardiac arrests

    Resuscitation

    (2013)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china

    J Emerg Med

    (2013)
  • M. Singer et al.

    The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • M.J. Hall et al.

    Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals

    NCHS Data Brief

    (2011)
  • D.C. Angus et al.

    Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care

    Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • P.E. Marik

    Surviving sepsis: going beyond the guidelines

    Ann Intensive Care

    (2011)
  • A. Pfuntner et al.

    Costs for hospital stays in the United States, 2010: statistical brief #146. Healthc. cost util. proj. stat. briefs

    (2006)
  • National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The most expensive conditions by payer, 2011: statistical brief #160 – PubMed–NCBI...
  • H.E. Wang et al.

    National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments

    Crit Care Med

    (2007)
  • R.P. Dellinger et al.

    Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012

    Intensive Care Med

    (2013)
  • A. Rhodes et al.

    The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome: results from the international multicentre prevalence study on sepsis (the IMPreSS study)

    Intensive Care Med

    (2015)
  • C.A. Croft et al.

    Computer versus paper system for recognition and management of sepsis in surgical intensive care

    J Trauma Acute Care Surg

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    Study site: All patients were enrolled at UF Health Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.

    ☆☆

    Source of funding: W. Martin Smith Interdisciplinary Patient Safety and Quality Award.

    ☆☆☆

    Conflict disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text